Politwoops Deleted Tweets from Politicians

An archive of the public statements deleted by U.S. politicians. Explore the tweets they would prefer you couldn't see.

To meet the Twitter API Terms of Service, all deleted tweets shown here since June 22, 2012 have been reviewed and approved by the Sunlight Foundation.

Original Dutch version:

Politwoops.nl

Recent Politwoops

This may be an incomplete list. If you think we're missing someone, please email us with their Name, State, Political Party, Office they hold or are seeking and, of course, Twitter handle. Thanks!

Gov. Buddy Roemer (R) @BuddyRoemer

Politwoops no longer follows this account.
Please "track" me on this site: http://t.co/VJ0e6L2g (Not sure how they decide top issues. Looks like they use data from 3rd party site)

Gov. Buddy Roemer (R) @BuddyRoemer

Politwoops no longer follows this account.
What about candidates issues? “@THEAndrewWinter: They have users rank what's important to them.”

Gov. Buddy Roemer (R) @BuddyRoemer

Politwoops no longer follows this account.
Sounds like a plan! “@howardlindzon: @BuddyRoemer lets get you on stocktwits tv and chat about it.”

Gov. Buddy Roemer (R) @BuddyRoemer

Politwoops no longer follows this account.
RT @JamesPindell: #Roemer says he'd pick Lieberman as VP #fitn #ctpolitics

Gov. Buddy Roemer (R) @BuddyRoemer

Politwoops no longer follows this account.
RT @spidersart: I just voted for Buddy Roemer as "Must-Follow Politician on Social Media" #MashableAwards http://t.co/vc7LApCh

Gov. Buddy Roemer (R) @BuddyRoemer

Politwoops no longer follows this account.
Throw Newt From the Train #999movienames

Gov. Buddy Roemer (R) @BuddyRoemer

Politwoops no longer follows this account.
Jumping the Shark #999movienames

Newt 2012 Campaign (R) @Newt2012HQ

Politwoops no longer follows this account.
@hort4cy Great to hear! We'd be thrilled to have your support.

Gov. Buddy Roemer (R) @BuddyRoemer

Politwoops no longer follows this account.
My first choice for VP running mate: http://t.co/HQfBOeY4

Justin Amash (R) @repjustinamash

A few commenters have suggested that the dangerous provisions in S 1867 (discussed in my previous post) do not... http://t.co/o7Z0CBQL

Results per page